by Sherina Yusof
Pakatan Rakyat leaders welcomed the admission by the Election
Commission that there were 40,000 ‘suspicious’ names in the voters lists, but
warned that this was probably the tip of the iceberg.
They also slammed EC Chief Abdul Aziz Mohd Yusof for not
discovering the flaws sooner, pointing out that such a huge error could have
made a big impact on the 2008 general eelction, where the Pakatan Rakyat won
only 5 states out of 13 despite obtaining 47 per cent of the popular vote.
“Why is it only now that the
EC has realized the existence of the suspicious voters. Did they not realize it
before this? If they did not, what about the status of the 12th general
election, which was filled with bad electoral role,” Suhaizan Kayat, a PAS
leader and polls activist, said in a statement.
"In his latest press statement, Tan Sri Abdul Aziz Mohd
Yusof revealed that there are 40,000 suspicious voters, whereas before this the
EC stated that there were 50,000 that are being investigated. How did the
10,000 voters disappear?”
NRD's
database also very 'suspicious'
Suhaizat also questioned Agency Link-Up System or ALIS, which
is a system that links up the EC’s database with the National Registration
Department. The EC and NRD had promoted the ALIS link as the safeguard that
would be used to ensure that individuals who register themselves as voters are
actual citizens.
But why didn't ALIS flag up the errors immediately, Suhaizat
demanded to know how. How could the NRD database could contain so many
suspicious names as the tagging of citizens was a national security priority,
he also asked. The huge number of flaws could only imply that the names were
planted into both EC and NRD systems as part of a plan to rig the voting
results.
“Before this, the EC was very proud to have a system that
links up with NRD. But now, it looks like the NRD database has flaws. Surely
the NRD must have an updated database in this country. But what have happened
to this system,” chided Suhaizat.
Under heavy public fire, the EC said last week that it would
be displaying a list of 40,000 names found in the electoral roll that could not
be verified. It was accused of revealing only the tip but not the full iceberg.
"Their status could not be ascertained, in some cases
the voter's name in the electoral roll differs with that recorded by the
National Registration Department. In other cases, we want to ensure whether the
voter is still alive or not," said EC chief Abdul Aziz.
Source : MC
No comments:
Post a Comment