Written
by Chua Jui Meng
 |
| Former Health Minister of Malaysia |
DEEPAK Jaikishan’s shocking and
damning revelations of his ties with Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak and wife
Rosmah Mansor is serious and embarrassing to Malaysia.
Deepak indirectly exposes Najib and Rosmah’s link with the murder
case of Mongolian interpreter Altantuya Shaariibuu via his involvement in
private investigator P. Balasubramaniam (PI Bala)’s statutory declarations.
Deepak also said his mistake was to jump in to help friends –
referring to Najib, who was then a defence minister, and his wife.
The ongoing RM6.7 billion scandalous purchase of two second-hand
French-made Scorpene submarines which is being investigated by a French court
is also damaging Najib and Malaysia.
Who in Umno stands to gain the most
Deepak’s timing to spill the beans on Najib and Rosmah is also
very suspicious – coming a day before Najib is scheduled to deliver his
presidential address at the opening of an annual Umno General Assembly.
The immediate question is: Who has managed to get Deepak to expose
Najib and Rosmah?
It can be answered with a question: Who stands to gain the most in
toppling the Umno president?
It will be amazing that Najib is able to face his Umno central
delegates without any feeling of embarrassment.
How can Najib’s conscience not be pricked with all the ongoing
scandals exposed is mind boggling.
How can Umno members, the enforcers of law and Malaysians in
general ignore such strong accusations against this man?
Loss of confidence
The federal administration is certainly undergoing a crisis of
sorts, and possibly a breakdown, when it cannot swiftly and confidently resolve
wrong doings afflicting the country, especially when it concerns public
accountability, corruption and crime.
Public confidence is therefore eroded, and the socio-economic
fabric of the nation is shaken.
We are witnessing a situation where all the institutions of a
government are unable to get their priorities right and fears the political
leaders of the ruling coalition.
The Barisan Nasional (BN)’s current mandate to govern ends on
April 28, 2013, with the automatic dissolution of the 222-seat Parliament.
The Election Commission will then have 60
days to conduct the 13th General Election.
Malaysians will have to make an honest and accurate assessment of
the Umno-led BN’s 55-year hold on power and its performance.
To all Malaysians, please treat the next general election
seriously because your ballots will decide your future and the welfare of your
children and future generations.
Reproduced below are PI Bala’s original (1st statutory
declaration), a report on Deepak spilling the beans on Najib and Rosmah, and a
background story on the Altantuya murder:
This is PI Bala’s original statutory declaration:
STATUTORY DECLARATION
I, Balasubramaniam a/l Perumal (NRIC NO: xxxxxx-xx-6235) a
Malaysian Citizen of full age and residing at [deleted], Selangor, do solemly
and sincerely declare as follows :-
1. I have been a police officer with the Royal Malaysian Police
Force having joined as a constable in 1981 attached to the Police Field Force.
I was then promoted to the rank of lance corporal and finally resigned from the
Police Force in 1998 when I was with the Special Branch.
2. I have been working as a freelance Private Investigator since I
left the Police Force.
3. Sometime in June or July 2006, I was employed by Abdul Razak
Baginda for a period of 10 days to look after him at his office at the Bangunan
Getah Asli, Jalan Ampang, between the hours of 8.00 a.m. to 5.00 p.m. each
working day as apparently he was experiencing disturbances from a third party.
4. I resigned from this job after 2 ½ days as I was not receiving
any proper instructions.
5. I was however re-employed by Abdul Razak Baginda on the
05-10-2006 as he had apparently received a harassing phone call from a Chinese
man calling himself ASP Tan who had threatened him to pay his debts. I later
found out this gentleman was in fact a private investigator called Ang who was
employed by a Mongolian woman called Altantuya Shaariibuu.
6. Abdul Razak Baginda was concerned that a person by the name of
Altantuya Shaariibuu, a Mongolian woman, was behind this threat and that she
would be arriving in Malaysia very soon to try and contact him.
7. Abdul Razak Baginda informed me that he was concerned by this
as he had been advised that Altantuya Shaariibuu had been given some powers by
a Mongolian ‘bomoh’ and that he could never look her in the face because of
this.
8. When I enquired as to who this Mongolian woman was, Abdul Razak
Baginda informed me that she was a friend of his who had been introduced to him
by a VIP and who asked him to look after her financially.
9. I advised him to lodge a police report concerning the threatening
phone call he had received from the Chinese man known as ASP Tan but he refused
to do so as he informed me there were some high profile people involved.
10. Abdul Razak Baginda further told me that Altantuya Shaariibuu
was a great liar and good in convincing people. She was supposed to have been
very demanding financially and that he had even financed a property for her in
Mongolia.
11. Abdul Razak Baginda then let me listen to some voice messages
on his handphone asking him to pay what was due otherwise he would be harmed
and his daughter harassed.
12. I was therefore supposed to protect his daughter Rowena as
well.
13. On the 09.10.2006, I received a phone call from Abdul Razak
Baginda at about 9.30 a.m. informing me that Altantuya was in his office and he
wanted me there immediately. As I was in the midst of a surveillance, I sent my
assistant Suras to Abdul Razak Baginda’s office and I followed a little later.
Suras managed to control the situation and had persuaded Altantuya and her two
friends to leave the premises. However Altantuya left a note written on some
Hotel Malaya note paper, in English, asking Abdul Razak Baginda to call her on
her handphone (number given) and wrote down her room number as well.
14. Altantuya had introduced herself to Suras as ‘Aminah’ and had
informed Suras she was there to see her boyfriend Abdul Razak Baginda.
15. These 3 Mongolian girls however returned to Abdul Razak
Baginda’s office at the Bangunan Getah Asli, Jalan Ampang again, the next day
at about 12.00 noon. They did not enter the building but again informed Suras
that they wanted to meet Aminah’s boyfriend, Abdul Razak Baginda.
16. On the 11.10.2006, Aminah returned to Abdul Razak Baginda’s
office on her own and gave me a note to pass to him, which I did. Abdul Razak
Baginda showed me the note, which basically asked him to call her urgently.
17. I suggested to Abdul Razak Baginda that perhaps it may be wise
to arrange for Aminah to be arrested if she harassed him further, but he
declined as he felt she would have to return to Mongolia as soon as her cash
ran out.
18. In the meantime I had arranged for Suras to perform
surveillance on Hotel Malaya to monitor the movements of these 3 Mongolian
girls, but they recognized him. Apparently they become friends with Suras after
that and he ended up spending a few nights in their hotel room.
19. When Abdul Razak Baginda discovered Suras was becoming close
to Aminah he asked me to pull him out from Hotel Malaya.
20. On the 14.10.2006, Aminah turned up at Abdul Razak Baginda’s house
in Damansara Heights when I was not there. Abdul Razak Baginda called me on my
handphone to inform me of this so I rushed back to his house. As I arrived, I
noticed Aminah outside the front gates shouting “Razak, bastard, come out from
the house”. I tried to calm her down but couldn’t so I called the police who
arrived in 2 patrol cars. I explained the situation to the police, who took her
away to the Brickfields police station.
21. I followed the patrol cars to Brickfields police station in a
taxi. I called Abdul Razak Baginda and his lawyer Dirren to lodge a police
report but they refused.
22. When I was at the Brickfields police station, Aminah’s own
Private Investigator, one Mr. Ang arrived and we had a discussion. I was told
to deliver a demand to Abdul Razak Baginda for USD$500,000.00 and 3 tickets to
Mongolia, apparently as commission owed to Aminah from a deal in Paris.
23. As Aminah had calmed down at this stage, a policewoman at the
Brickfields police station advised me to leave and settle the matter amicably.
24. I duly informed Abdul Razak Baginda of the demands Aminah had
made and told him I was disappointed that no one wanted to back me up in
lodging a police report. We had a long discussion about the situation when I
expressed a desire to pull out of this assignment.
25. During this discussion and in an attempt to persuade me to
continue my employment with him, Abdul Razak Baginda informed me that :-
25.1. He had been introduced to Aminah by Datuk Seri Najib Tun
Razak at a diamond exhibition in Singapore.
25.2. Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak informed Abdul Razak Baginda that
he had a sexual relationship with Aminah and that she was susceptible to anal
intercourse.
25.3. Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak wanted Abdul Razak Baginda to
look after Aminah as he did not want her to harass him since he was now the
Deputy Prime Minister.
25.4. Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak, Abdul Razak Baginda and Aminah
had all been together at a dinner in Paris.
25.5. Aminah wanted money from him as she felt she was entitled to
a USD$500,000.00 commission on a submarine deal she assisted with in Paris.
26. On the 19.10.2006, I arrived at Abdul Razak Baginda’s house in
Damansara Heights to begin my night duty. I had parked my car outside as usual.
I saw a yellow Proton Perdana taxi pass by with 3 ladies inside, one of whom
was Aminah. The taxi did a U-turn and stopped in front of the house where these
ladies rolled down the window and wished me ‘Happy Deepavali’. The taxi then
left.
27. About 20 minutes later the taxi returned with only Aminah in
it. She got out of the taxi and walked towards me and started talking to me. I
sent an SMS to Abdul Razak Baginda informing him “Aminah was here”. I received
an SMS from Razak instructing me to “delay her until my man comes”.
28. Whist I was talking to Aminah, she informed me of the
following :-
28.1. That she met Abdul Razak Baginda in Singapore with Datuk
Seri Najib Tun Razak.
28.2. That she had also met Abdul Razak Baginda and Datuk Seri
Najib Tun Razak at a dinner in Paris.
28.3. That she was promised a sum of USD$500,000.00 as commission
for assisting in a Submarine deal in Paris.
28.4. That Abdul Razak Baginda had bought her a house in Mongolia
but her brother had refinanced it and she needed money to redeem it.
28.5. That her mother was ill and she needed money to pay for her
treatment.
28.6. That Abdul Razak Baginda had married her in Korea as her
mother is Korean whilst her father was a Mongolian/Chinese mix.
28.7. That if I wouldn’t allow her to see Abdul Razak Baginda,
would I be able to arrange for her to see Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak.
29. After talking to Aminah for about 15 minutes, a red Proton
Aeroback arrived with a woman and two men. I now know the woman to be Lance
Corporal Rohaniza and the men, Azilah Hadri and Sirul Azahar. They were all in
plain clothes. Azilah walked towards me while the other two stayed in the car.
30. Azilah asked me whether the woman was Aminah and I said ‘Yes’.
He then walked off and made a few calls on his handphone. After 10 minutes
another vehicle, a blue Proton Saga, driven by a Malay man, passed by slowly.
The driver’s window had been wound down and the driver was looking at us.
31. Azilah then informed me they would be taking Aminah away. I
informed Aminah they were arresting her. The other two persons then got out of
the red Proton and exchanged seats so that Lance Corporal Rohaniza and Aminah
were in the back while the two men were in the front. They drove off and that
is the last I ever saw of Aminah.
32. Abdul Razak Baginda was not at home when all this occurred.
33. After the 19.10.2006, I continued to work for Abdul Razak
Baginda at his house in Damansara Heights from 7.00 p.m. to 8.00 a.m. the next
morning, as he had been receiving threatening text messages from a woman called
‘Amy’ who was apparently ‘Aminah’s’ cousin in Mongolia.
34. On the night of the 20.10.2006, both of Aminah’s girlfriends
turned up at Abdul Razak Baginda’s house enquiring where Aminah was. I informed
them she had been arrested the night before.
35. A couple of nights later, these two Mongolian girls, Mr. Ang
and another Mongolian girl called ‘Amy’ turned up at Abdul Razak Baginda’s
house looking for Aminah as they appeared to be convinced she was being held in
the house.
36. A commotion began so I called the police who arrived shortly
thereafter in a patrol car. Another patrol car arrived a short while later in
which was the investigating officer from the Dang Wangi Police Station who was
in charge of the missing persons report lodged by one of the Mongolians girls,
I believe was Amy.
37. I called Abdul Razak Baginda who was at home to inform him of
the events taking place at his front gate. He then called DSP Musa Safri and
called me back informing me that Musa Safri would be calling my handphone and I
was to pass the phone to the Inspector from the Dang Wangi Police Station.
38. I then received a call on my handphone from Musa Safri and
duly handed the phone to the Dang Wangi Inspector. The conversation lasted 3 –
4 minutes after which he told the girls to disperse and to go to see him the
next day.
39. On or about the 24.10.2006, Abdul Razak Baginda instructed me
to accompany him to the Brickfields Police Station as he had been advised to
lodge a police report about the harassment he was receiving from these
Mongolian girls.
40. Before this, Amy had sent me an SMS informing me she was going
to Thailand to lodge a report with the Mongolian consulate there regarding
Aminah’s disappearance. Apparently she had sent the same SMS to Abdul Razak
Baginda. This is why he told me he had been advised to lodge a police report.
41. Abdul Razak Baginda informed me that DPS Musa Safri had
introduced him to one DSP Idris, the head of the Criminal division, Brickfields
Police Station, and that Idris had referred him to ASP Tonny.
42. When Abdul Razak Baginda had lodged his police report at
Brickfields Police Station, in front of ASP Tonny, he was asked to make a
statement but he refused as he said he was leaving for overseas. He did however
promise to prepare a statement and hand ASP Tonny a thumb drive. I know that
this was not done as ASP Tonny told me.
43. However ASP Tonny asked me the next day to provide my
statement instead and so I did.
44. I stopped working for Abdul Razak Baginda on the 26.10.2006 as
this was the day he left for Hong Kong on his own.
45. In mid-November 2006, I received a phone call from ASP Tonny
from the IPK Jalan Hang Tuah asking me to see him regarding Aminah’s case. When
I arrived there I was immediately arrested under S.506 of the Penal Code for
Criminal intimidation.
46. I was then placed in the lock up and remanded for 5 days. On
the third day I was released on police bail.
47. At the end of November 2006, the D9 department of the IPK sent
a detective to my house to escort me to the IPK Jalan Hang Tuah. When I
arrived, I was told I was being arrested under S.302 of the Penal Code for
murder. I was put in the lock up and remanded for 7 days.
48. I was transported to Bukit Aman where I was interrogated and
questioned about an SMS I had received from Abdul Razak Baginda on the
19.10.2006, which read “delay her until my man arrives”. They had apparently
retrieved this message from Abdul Razak Baginda’s handphone.
49. They then proceeded to record my statement from 8.30 a.m. to
6.00 p.m. every day for 7 consecutive days. I told them all I knew including
everything Abdul Razak Baginda and Aminah had told me about their relationships
with Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak but when I came to sign my statement these
details had been left out.
50. I have given evidence in the trial of Azilah, Sirul and Abdul
Razak Baginda at the Shah Alam High Court. The prosecutor did not ask me any
questions in respect of Aminah’s relationship with Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak
or of the phone call I received from DSP Musa Safri, whom I believe was the ADC
for Datuk Seri Najib Razak and/or his wife.
51. On the day Abdul Razak Baginda was arrested, I was with him at
his lawyers office at 6.30 a.m. Abdul Razak Baginda informed us that he had
sent Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak an SMS the evening before as he refused to
believe he was to be arrested, but had not received a response.
52. Shortly thereafter, at about 7.30 a.m., Abdul Razak Baginda
received an SMS from Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak and showed, this message to
both myself and his lawyer. This message read as follows :- “I am seeing IGP at
11.00 a.m. today …… matter will be solved … be cool”.
53. I have been made to understand that Abdul Razak Baginda was
arrested the same morning at his office in the Bangunan Getah Asli, Jalan
Ampang.
54. The purpose of this Statutory declaration is to :-
54.1. State my disappointment at the standard of investigations
conducted by the authorities into the circumstances surrounding the murder of
Altantuya Shaariibuu.
54.2. Bring to the notice of the relevant authorities the strong
possibility that there are individuals other than the 3 accused who must have
played a role in the murder of Altantuya Shaariibuu.
54.3. Persuade the relevant authorities to reopen their
investigations into this case immediately so that any fresh evidence may be
presented to the Court prior to submissions at the end of the prosecutions
case.
54.4. Emphasize the fact that having been a member of the Royal
Malaysian Police Force for 17 years I am absolutely certain no police officer
would shoot someone in the head and blow up their body without receiving
specific instructions from their superiors first.
54.5. Express my concern that should the defence not be called in
the said murder trial, the accused, Azilah and Sirul will not have to swear on
oath and testify as to the instructions they received and from whom they were
given.
55. And I make this solemn declaration conscientiously believing
the same be true and by virtue of the provisions of the Statutory Declaration
Act 1960.
SUBCRIBED and solemnly )
declared by the abovenamed )
Balasubramaniam
a/l Perumal ]
this 1st day of July 2008 )
Before me,
………………………………….
Commissioner
for Oath
Kuala Lumpur
Wednesday, 28 November 2012 07:52
'Carpetman' linked to Altantuya trial tells all to Harakahdaily
A controversial figure in the saga of P Balasubramaniam, the
private investigator who issued a damning statutory declaration implicating
prime minister Najib Razak of an affair with murdered Mongolian citizen
Altantuya Shaariibuu only to retract it the next day, has decided to come clean
on his much talked relationship with Najib's family.
Deepak Jaikishan (pic) contacted Harakahdaily to tell his story,
by first confirming speculation of his ties with Najib and his wife, Rosmah
Mansor.
“I do know Datuk Seri [Najib] and Puan Seri [Rosmah]. I am a
carpet supplier and involved in business. Where there is business opportunity,
we ask for their support,” he told Harakahdaily during an interview at a hotel
in Kuala Lumpur.
Deepak claimed he knew Rosmah when she visited his shop in Jalan
Tunku Abdul Rahman back in 2004 or 2005, when Najib was still the Defence
minister.
Asked why his person was the subject of intense discussion, Deepak
admitted that it had to do with Bala’s case.
“Yes, I sense it too [being subject of talk]. May be my mistake is
helping in the case of Bala, getting involved in Bala’s case to help the family
of the prime minister. That was when I became famous.I don't like it, I'd like
to be low profile,” said Deepak, who added that being low profile made it
easier to business in Malaysia.
Deepak described his involvement in Bala’s case akin to rescuing a
friend drowning in a swimming pool.
“So I jumped into the pool to help a friend. I felt at that time,
I was the only one (they) sought after for help. It's not that I helped
directly. The lawyer was theirs, I just helped in coordinating,” he said, who
quickly replied "Najib's family" when asked whom he meant by
'theirs'.
Deepak said as he had close ties with Najib and Rosmah, he did not
feel that getting involved in the Altantuya case was burdensome.
'My mistake'
Deepak said he did not know Bala personally and was introduced to
him by a police friend.
“That was my mistake. If it happens again, I would not swim, when
I see you drowning, I will let you drown. I cannot help when people don't
appreciate what we did," Deepak lamented.
Bala, who was the private detective hired by Abdul Razak Baginda,
the former aide of Najib who was acquitted by the court of murdering Altantuya,
issued a statutory declaration on July 3, 2008, before retracting it the next
day.
Not long after, he fled the country, saying he feared for his life
and his family's safety.
In 2009, Bala claimed he had been paid RM5 million by Deepak to
retract his first statutory declaration.
Deepak said Bala was not angry at him, but at those who failed to
keep their promise to Bala.
Asked on his present relationship with Najib, Deepak said he was
being faulted for not being able to fulfill all of Bala’s demands.
“I think after what took place, they had wanted to silence me. The
way they treated me was like a friend who helped another friend. The reward
they gave was sending over 50 officers to visit when Bala’s case was
exposed.... At that time, Najib was the sitting prime minister. 50 enforcers
came in five or six lorries,” he said.
Recalling the treatment accorded to him, Deepak said he then sent
a message that he should ignored his “drowning” friend.
“I am just interested to clean my name. I am not involved in
business with them. For over two years, no business with them, but the story
still come out,” added Deepak.
For Deepak, the end would only come once Altantuya received a just
trial.
“I don’t want to get involved. It’s clear that my involvement that
night was just to help a friend and the statutory declaration was made by their
lawyer," said Deepak regretfully.
-Harakahdaily
Wednesday, 07 November 2012 09:26
'WHO KILLED ALTANTUYA' may well enter the Worlds's Guinness Book
of Records
Written by Terracotta, Kuala Lumpur
If BN wants to ride the storms building up as we countdown to our
mother-of-elections, GE 13, it must solve the mysteries surrounding the brutal
slaying of a foreign national – and a mother and daughter she happens to be.
So far none within the rank and files of BN have had the courage
to echo with all concerned citizens the piercing questions that remain shrouded
in swaddles of political intrigue and mystery:
Why was a lone woman, who was helpless in the powerful arms of
slayers so brutally annihilated with C4?
How come we do not know and neither do the Palace of Justice want
to unravel as to who authorized the use of military grade explosive on a
single, lone mother?
Who gave the marching orders for the diligent Immigration staff to
delete all entry and egress records of a visitor to our nation who came here
without the slightest clue of what dangers lay ahead of her given the plotting
mysterious people who would have had a hand in the eventual murder of
Altantuya?
How come it has been ruled that motive is not significant to
establish the whole truth and nothing but the truth?
These are questions that have asked relentless in public forums
and in the alternate media as well as in private conversations, corporate
corridors and at warongs all across the country.
But there appear to be dead silence from the corners of the BN
fort. No one leader had expressed the importance and the crucial need to seek
out answers to these questions.
We only hear members from civil society and the opposition front
expressing concerns and begging for honest answers but only end up facings
rebuttals and reprimands not to 'politicize' the crime.
It therefore appears set that it does not matter any more why and
how this helpless, fragile woman met her death in the hands of a thick plot.
YOKE
OF DISGRACE: Betrayal of nation's integrity
Soon we will be marching to the polls demanding many things to
change or celebrating with BN for their “promises fulfilled”.
But little do we care that our nation’s hands are stained with
murder. Little do we bother that while we are fighting for justice as we court
that hope of an opposition victory or celebrating with BN for all that has been
– good and bad, these past five over decades, the slaying of a foreign citizen
is actually wrapped and sealed in mystery that appears to be coated thick with
a political plot.
The truth is, for as long as the people of Malaysia are helpless
and unable or could not care-a-less to throw wide open all lids on the murder,
BN’s conscience remains guilty.
The least the BN leaders could do is at best to ensure that
answers to the long outstanding questions are laid bare.
The day the nation enters the Guinness Book of Records for a
murder unresolved, we would have hung a yoke of disgrace permanently on the
neck of all Malaysians before the just world of citizens outside our shores.
That then in essence is the biggest treason ever to be committed
against a nation by its own leaders.
How come then no one wants to debate this issue or question it?
The eerie silence haunts the very soul of this nation making all the
over-heating pre-election debates over religion and the religious status of
this country mere hogwash.
MAILBAG
No comments:
Post a Comment